Posts tagged as:

law

Several years ago, I switched my law practice from mass torts (plane crashes and shipwrecks) in New York City to corporate law at a large Silicon Valley law firm. As a result of that experience and clients I worked with in the years following the dotcom bust, I developed a number of simplifying rules about corporate transactions, particularly general corporate, corporate structure and corporate governance.

One question almost every first-time entrepreneur (and most second-timers) have is “How do I incorporate?” When you do it properly, this isn’t particularly earth-shattering legal work; I’ve done this sort of work for companies using firm quotes of $2000 + state filing fees for a full incorporation package, including a lot of form documents necessary to engage new employees, issue stock to founders, etc. That figure includes my time advising on everything from the number of directors to how to divide up stock to what provisions founders need to protect themselves from each other. It’s clear that the fee involves mostly the ancillary advice about what to do, not filling out forms.

For the purposes of this question, you should have already determined that you (a) need to form an entity, (b) that entity should be a corporation, and (c) you want to be expedient while avoiding future expenses.

In general, companies should incorporate in Delaware if they’re going to be venture-funded and have the modest amount of extra money to lay out for administrative costs. That said, many, many companies in the SF Bay Area simply incorporate in California to reduce those expenses, particularly if they’re going to bootstrap for a while. VCs and other investors in the area are very familiar with California companies and don’t get bothered by it at all. What I would recommend against, in general, is incorporating anywhere else besides those two states. The costs will go up for regular compliance and administration, and you’ll only have to reincorporate later if you get funding.

You will likely  need specific advice on the entity selection question, which depends heavily on the type of business you’re considering and the plans you are making. Sometimes a corporation isn’t the best choice.

{ 0 comments }

I recently came across a LinkedIn question asking about entity selection for a social enterprise. The generic question for a generic business is what people often conceive of as an “easy question” with a simple answer.

Here’s my answer:

Laura, the question you ask is only properly answered in light of more important questions. I’ve posed many of these in my article on social enterprises linked below.

As I tell all my clients starting organizations, you need to start with your goals and business model. (And trust me, every organization has a business model — what comes in, what you do with it, what goes out, and what you do with what’s left over.)

So start by defining what you want to do, on a day to day and big picture basis. Then, you take that description and give it to someone like me, a corporate lawyer, and you can get a specific recommendation that fits your particular circumstances. Those circumstances include the state you’re in, tax considerations, financing matters, distributing surpluses (e.g., profits), and control issues.

I’m very good at what I do, but I can’t give you a specific answer without knowing what your vision is and then sorting through your goals. No one can.

Of course, the answer is the same for every other generic business — there’s no way to properly answer the question without knowing all the details. I can tell you the basic model for a VC-financed tech startup, but I can’t advise you that it’s the right structure for you and your company. Until you get properly customized advice, your choices are to ignore the complexities or to use these sorts of answers to learn how to make a decision.

What areas of the law do you think should have more generic advice? Are there any fields where an 80% solution really works best for a lot of people? What about special needs trusts (an area I’m working myself into in the very near future)?

{ 1 comment }

Great lawyers don’t sell forms

17 November 2010

Here’s a LinkedIn question about LLC operating agreements. The poster wonders whether the operating agreement he received from the entity formation company is a little “generic” and asks the forum for specific advice about what should be included. The answers point to some provisions that should be included (division of gains and losses, breakup/buyout/dissolution schemes, [...]

1 comment Read more ›

Draft better contracts by paying attention to words

12 October 2010

This post on the use of the term immediately, one of many similar explorations by Ken Adams, is the sort of thing that attracts me to contract drafting. There is a lot to be said for using the right language to convey an idea: language that is clear, concise, hard to misconstrue, and simple without [...]

0 comments Read more ›

Five-minute general counsel: should I be a social enterprise?

9 September 2010

Here’s a question on quasi-nonprofits that I’ve been hearing more often: Do I need to have a nonprofit status to become a social entrepreneurial enterprise? I found this LinkedIn question to be interesting for two reasons: first, it’s very related to a nonprofit question I field all the time, and second, I have a current [...]

1 comment Read more ›

Five-minute general counsel: when should I consider a convertible bridge?

5 September 2010

I have more than one client currently considering convertible bridge notes as a parallel angel/seed round funding technique, and I have one who recently closed a small convertible note that will convert in the upcoming seed round. What’s a convertible bridge note? A convertible bridge note is a not-uncommon financing instrument in venture capital. This [...]

0 comments Read more ›

Five-minute general counsel: What is due diligence?

9 August 2010

Due diligence is the catchall phrase used to describe both the amorphous investigative process that prospective investors and acquirors go through before, during, and after their initial decision to proceed with a transaction with your company as well as the materials (paper, electronic, and Q&A) that they and their advisors receive in response to their [...]

1 comment Read more ›

Why you should back away from reverse mergers

18 June 2010

This LinkedIn question asking about reverse mergers is a question I’ve answered for a lot of entrepreneurs who get pitched by these folks and are invariably misled confused about where, how, and whether this deal brings money into the company. “What is a reverse merger or reverse IPO?” Short answer: “reverse merger” is almost always [...]

0 comments Read more ›

Getting crowdfunding wrong

28 May 2010

Here’s a link to a brief article about crowdsourcing as applied to startups. Grade for this article? Nominally 80% for 4 out of 5 right, but the wrong answer on financing can kill a company. This one gets a #FAIL from me. Hearkening back (or forward, since I don’t know if I’ve posted it yet) [...]

3 comments Read more ›

Tough legal job market is now just plain ugly for some

28 May 2010

I’ve written before about the growing inconsistency between the actual job market for lawyers and the jobs that law schools tell prospective students about. Here’s a recent Above the Law post on a job that really doesn’t appear all that worthwhile, really. This is a downgrade from the $12 job they link to at the [...]

0 comments Read more ›