Posts tagged as:

tips

Due diligence is the catchall phrase used to describe both the amorphous investigative process that prospective investors and acquirors go through before, during, and after their initial decision to proceed with a transaction with your company as well as the materials (paper, electronic, and Q&A) that they and their advisors receive in response to their questions.

You may or may not get a formal list from the other side, depending on their level of formality and the nature of their advisors. Some investors know exactly what they are looking for and will figure out what they want to do from your financial model and a series of conversations. Others assume that the only way to be sure is to review a mountain of paperwork. The real answer lies somewhere in-between for most companies.

So, to get you started or at least calm you, here is a super Short Form Due Diligence Request List for a seed round investment or low-key quasi-acquisition, such as an asset purchase or stealth acquisition.

First, keep in mind that the other party may, and probably will, ask for additional information. Our goal here is first to identify anything that might concern them so it can be defused or resolved before it’s ever disclosed. (Hint to bad lawyers: you cannot hide things; there’s always a second copy floating around; the goal is to solve the problem so you can disclose how it has already been fixed.) Our second goal is to streamline as much of your work as possible so that you are not under time pressure later. The third goal is to identify the factual support for the business plan/budget that will be a critical piece of the transaction.

Here is the list of other materials you should be gathering in the background as negotiations continue, documents are drafted, and the deal moves forward.

  1. Financials — Copies of all historical financials for existing operations: Income Statement, Balance Sheet, and Cashflow statements. (A backup version of a QB file is something that I regularly work with to extract these directly if necessary.)
  2. Material contracts — all contracts that are either above a specified dollar value ($10-25k) or are otherwise important to the continued operations of the business on a similar basis. This should usually include customer contracts, all leases, all promissory notes, and IP licenses, and anything to do with stock or securities (like a warrant agreement or agreement to trade stock for services of a consultant).
  3. Corporate documents — Copies of current articles/certificate of incorporation & bylaws; minute book with board/shareholder consents & minutes.
  4. Other risks — A description of any pending litigation, whether company is plaintiff or defendant; any audit letters from auditors if financials have been audited in last 3 years; a description of any off-balance sheet obligations or other liabilities; and a summary of any related-party transactions, individually or in the aggregate greater than $25,000.

This ThoughtStorm Due Diligence Request list is a version written from the perspective of an investor and is a little more detailed than what I have above. It’s more like a reasonably thorough list that will get you most of the way to complete for an early-stage company.

{ 1 comment }

Email tips? Really?

April 27, 2010 · 0 comments

One of my favorite authors, Seth Godin, recently posted another little list of email tips.

Of course, they’re pretty much all useful and accurate. I mean, it’s hard to write a “tip” that is flat-out wrong. But I was thinking about it more in the sense of why, in 2010, do high-profile people with things to say get caught up in “email tips” or other minutiae of their fields?

For Seth, email is no more specially relevant (in the sense it’s discussed here) than it is for pretty much anyone. (He does have special things to say about marketing emails to customers and how to dance the tango with that one; but that’s really about marketing, not email.) For Fred Wilson, partner at Union Square Ventures, the basic, undergrad level stuff about finance that he’s been posting as “MBA Mondays” is far below the level at which he’s presumably operating (assumption based on: Wharton MBA, co-founder Flatiron Partners, investor in Twitter, Foursquare, Etsy, Meetup, Return Path, Del.icio.us, Feedburner).

So two questions: first, why don’t we know how to use email yet? Is it really just that everyone my parents’ age is emailing all the time now? Really? For work? They’re in their early 60s. I don’t think there are many folks that age just starting to use email in the workplace, but I could be wrong. Show me, and I’ll believe it.

What should experts write about?

Second, if you’re a hotshot guru, if you’re an actual expert at something, even if that’s being an expert in communicating about something that seems mundane or even unimportant or at least non-mystical to many people (Blogs about wine? Gardening? Cooking? With a waffle iron?), what would drive you to spend time on these types of seemingly low-value questions? Is it just about sharing what’s free?

I thought recently about why I answer basic questions in my field — it’s because my clients are not experts in the field and these seemingly basic questions are not basic for them. So it’s my belief that these readers get value disproportionate (hopefully in their favor!) to my cost to provide it. It gives them a chance to learn about my way of approaching problems, a sense of my depth of of knowledge on the real issues, and maybe even an introduction to me when we wouldn’t have met otherwise. So sure, the Five-Minute General Counsel series is marketing. But it provides value because it’s me talking about topics on which I am an expert.

I am worried about the viability of my potential client base, however, if the pool of startup candidates for Fred’s attention are so far down the learning curve in terms of business planning that they don’t understand discount rates, CAGR, or the law of large numbers. Conveniently for many of them, I’m well-versed in finance too. Financial models and ranger-level attention to detail? Match made in heaven (twice).

Front-line management (which is the starting point for most leadership development) has had its share of tips from me, which I think of as different, but maybe that’s not true. And I’ve written about email and productivity too. Part of the productivity dance is sharing what works for me, a version of the mobile professional: I’m a lawyer and strategic advisor who works with relatively small teams on any particular engagement or matter. My advice is  (not the same as having 75+ people working on a software beta launch).

Email tips? Really?

So back to the main point: really, do we still need email tips? Even people of my generation (early 40s, or what I like to call “mid-30s”) who didn’t see email commonly until after college (for me, it was law school in 1994 at Cornell that introduced email as a common tool), have still had 15+ years of experience with email.

If we keep working at this level, if we don’t expect some kind of improvement, we’re going to be telling people every year for the next 50 years about how to write emails, how to read email, and how to save money for retirement.

We can’t have our smartest guides, our best communicators, teaching remedial classes. Not if we want to make any progress.

{ 0 comments }

When don’t you need an app?

11 April 2010

Confession: I bought an iPad, the smallest wifi-only version. I wanted something that was more functional than my Blackberry Pearl but with a more convenient form factor than my laptop for use during parts of my commute. Here’s the question: I’ve been using Basecamp for internal (and now external) projects, and I had been of [...]

2 comments Read more ›

Fauxtivation

27 January 2010

What is Fauxtivation? It’s hiding the ball from your customers to try to create a motivation to engage with your company that they wouldn’t naturally have, i.e., don’t need and don’t want. Example: “emailing” travel reservation info that consists of a link to a website rather than, you know, the actual itinerary info. (Tip: that [...]

0 comments Read more ›

New page of observations

27 November 2009

Following in the footsteps of giants, I’ve decided to create a separate page to track my notes on shared items from Google Reader. One reason for this is to encourage me to comment on GReader items rather than save them until I have time to write full-fledged blog posts. The only issue I see with [...]

0 comments Read more ›

How-to: Forward a Facebook event to your friends

13 October 2009

My son’s school, REED Academy has a Facebook fan page as well. I created that page since I’ve been using social media, including blogs, twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook to expand awareness of causes important to me as well as teach people about my legal expertise in corporate governance and my practice in special education / [...]

0 comments Read more ›

Five-minute general counsel: licensing audits

8 October 2009

Kat Shoa asked about licensing audits on LinkedIn: How do you know if your IP licensees are paying you properly? I sat on a presentation about royalty audits today and think it’s a fantastic to collect due royalties – wrote about it here[.] But I’d be interested to know what other methods are used to [...]

0 comments Read more ›

Memories on TV?

3 September 2009

Quick note: watching an episode of Throwdown with Bobby Flay. He’s at Phil’s Fish Market in Monterey, CA (technically Moss Landing). Pam looked at it and said, “hey, isn’t that the place we used to go?” Turns out it definitely is. We would go to the Aquarium in Monterey with visitors and stop there for [...]

0 comments Read more ›

Software bounty — $100 WordPress self-link plugin

18 August 2009

Reading a recent comment on the WordPress users’ group on Triiibes, I realized that a new user was having a problem that actually does affect me as well. The user complained that he couldn’t figure out how to post a link to a previous post. Of course, the response is you type the anchor text, [...]

0 comments Read more ›

Code-word plugin could increase webapp usage

17 August 2009

I just got this cross-selling email from Basecamp today. I was thinking about it in the context of providing great outsourced workflow management in a package that is easyto use because it’s controlled and relatively narrow: you can customize it a bit but you can’t really build it out or add features and you certainly [...]

0 comments Read more ›